General resources
Review author starter kit LINK
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions - the official guide to producing Cochrane reviews LINK
Methodological Expectations of Cochrane Intervention Reviews (MECIR) - highly desirable and mandatory requirements for conduct and reporting of protocols, new reviews and updates LINK
Core software (Revman 5, Revman Web, Covidence, EPPI-reviewer, GRADEpro GDT) LINK
Cochrane methods (Cochrane Interactive Learning, GRADE approach, Common errors in reviews, NMA methods) LINK
Conflict of interest policy LINK
Useful tips
How to add/amend your affiliation(s) for a review byline LINK
How to update your Cochrane Account details LINK
Cochrane Heart methods guidance (last updated October 2019) LINK
Common errors and good practice when writing a review protocol – 90 minutes webinar (with pdf of presentation slides) LINK
Common errors and good practice in intervention reviews LINK
Incorporating GRADE in reviews LINK
Avoid interpreting results as statistically significant - a brief document from Cochrane Vascular LINK
Describing results LINK
Training
Cochrane online training modules - conducting an intervention review. LINK
Cochrane Centres and CRG based workshops - With its growing network of local Cochrane Centres, there is greater opportunity for authors to find local, face to face workshop training. These are also great opportunities to meet other authors and exchange ideas, issues, or share problems to find solutions, as well as to gain insights from the experience of Cochrane trainers. LINK
GRADE and Summary of Findings Tables - It is mandatory to include a Summary of Findings table for patient-relevant outcomes in your review/update as well as GRADE assessments of the quality of the evidence. LINK
Common errors - a resource for Editors to enhance editorial skills by identifying the most common errors that can occur in the editorial process of a Cochrane review. LINK
Other resources
Task Exchange - A platform to find support with your review tasks. The Heart Group encourages authors to leverage Task Exchange for systematic review task completion. We recommend that discussions related to inclusion of authors as well as author order be held prior to initiation of task sharing and that all authors be included in these discussions. All authors must beet ICMJE criteria. We the editors will not mediate these negotiations. LINK